Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads


-->
Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
July 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
* * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Displaying a decent respect to the opinions of mankind

by: Jay Stevens

Tue Jul 08, 2008 at 13:51:46 PM MDT


For the Fourth, Ochenski penned a brilliant column comparing Jefferson's complaints against the English King justifying American independence to contemporary infractions wrought by the Bush administration.

The words are GO's, the links are mine:

Jay Stevens :: Displaying a decent respect to the opinions of mankind
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices." Sounds like Bush's political vetting of judicial hires.

"He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance." Sounds like Homeland Security.

"He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power." Sounds like covert black ops and the unverifiable black budgets that fund them.

"He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws." Sounds like warrantless spying and incarceration without due process.

"For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury." Sounds like ignoring habeas corpus.

"For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offenses." Sounds like Guantanamo.

And just think, GO addressed only a portion of Jefferson's original complaints. (For example, he left out this one: "He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good." How about Bush's prolifigate use of presidential signing statements? And so on.)

GO: "Given the eerie comparisons to our current government and the way it has operated for the last eight years, if we were to take the sage advice of our forefathers, we would find it our 'right and duty' to 'throw off' the government under which we now live."

It's a good question why the institutions of press and politics don't see the Bush administration as a threat and demand, at the very least, impeachment. It's a good question why many Democrats are lining up to legalize some of the obviously unconstitutional aspects of the Bush "anti-terror" polices - policies that punish Americans first. It's a good question why conservatives - most of them as patriotic as any of us - aren't lining up with us, calling for Bush's prosecution and a reinstatement of our precious civil liberties.

Good questions, all. No answers, though.

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
No answers? (0.00 / 0)

"All the king's horses and all the king's men..."

I realize that I am probably more optomistic than need be (0.00 / 0)
But there are some from the right who are waking up to the civil liberties being stolen from us.  Admittedly many are only doing so because of the Democrats enabling of it.  Tiny steps, I guess.

And yet there have been no calls (0.00 / 0)
for another constitutional convention.  
What was it somebody said about repeating the same actions over and over again while expecting different results..?

As appealing as a ConCon may be (0.00 / 0)
Would the powers that be trust the people of this country to write one?

I remember how great it was for the Montana ConCon that no elected public officials could run for a place on the convention. Some real progressive work actually got done.


[ Parent ]
I don't care, really. (0.00 / 0)
What we have now hasn't worked very well--ever; but, since WWII--and most obviously--since 1981, it has not worked at all.
If a ConCon were to be scuttled by the powers that be, it would only be more proof of the failure of our current system...  

[ Parent ]
Well (0.00 / 0)
Then come up with a better fricking idea.  Please ...

[ Parent ]
I'll leave that up to (0.00 / 0)
the graduate assistants from Dillon state...

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Should Congress focus more on creating jobs or reducing the short-term deficit?
Creating Jobs
Reducing the Short-Term Deficit

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox