Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Refreshing Honesty

by: Anna

Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 18:14:49 PM MDT


The Democratic nominee discusses NAFTA with Fortune and displays a level of self-reflection that I've found unusual among most of the politicians I've known:

In an interview with Fortune to be featured in the magazine's upcoming issue, the presumptive Democratic nominee backed off his harshest attacks on the free trade agreement and indicated he didn't want to unilaterally reopen negotiations on NAFTA.

"Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified," he conceded, after I reminded him that he had called NAFTA "devastating" and "a big mistake," despite nonpartisan studies concluding that the trade zone has had a mild, positive effect on the U.S. economy.

Does that mean his rhetoric was overheated and amplified? "Politicians are always guilty of that, and I don't exempt myself," he answered.

Frankly, I'm pretty impressed.  

Anna :: Refreshing Honesty
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Unilateralism would be a new thing (0.00 / 0)
Obama's penchant for reflection and depth of self-knowledge is appealing. I'm not sure that's what the article was meant to highlight.

What caught my eye was this tidbit:

In a press conference in Boston this week, [John McCain] attacked Obama as protectionist: "Senator Obama said that he would unilaterally - unilaterally! - renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement, where 33 percent of our trade exists. And you know what message that sends? That no agreement is sacred if someone declares that as president of the United States they would unilaterally renegotiate it."

I can hardly wait for Nina Easton to let us know about John McCain's principled decision to opt back into the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.


Um (0.00 / 0)
I'm not sure that's what the article was meant to highlight.

Yeah, you're right, but that's what struck me about the article, and it's why I decided to post about it.  It is not shocking that campaign rhetoric gets overheated, but it's pretty surprising to see a politician admit that, and acknowledge the role they personally play in that process.  I am not sure what in my post suggested that I thought the article was about Obama's honesty.  


[ Parent ]
Just riffing (0.00 / 0)
I probably only posted here because I could not locate Ms. Easton's e-mail address to directly ask her to follow up with McCain about ABM. Lords of Google Alerts, hear my cry.

[ Parent ]
Just riffing (0.00 / 0)
I probably only posted here because I could not locate Ms. Easton's e-mail address to directly ask her to follow up with McCain about ABM. Lords of Google Alerts, hear my cry.

[ Parent ]
HD 63 (0.00 / 0)
HD 63 could be surprisingly tight also.

Nader predicted this sellout ... (0.00 / 0)
Varadarajan: Mr. Obama has opposed the North American Free Trade Agreement, and said that he wants it renegotiated; he's chastised the Big Three in Detroit for opposing higher CAFE standards; he emphasizes at every opportunity that he takes no money from lobbyists. What [do you] think of that?

Nader: You see, that's all permissible populist rhetoric that the corporations understand and wink at. Look at who gets the corporate money. Six out of seven industries giving money, through PACs and individual executives, etc., are giving more money to the Democrats than to the Republicans. I mean, John McCain's having trouble raising money, even now.

Obama's taking large money from the securities industry, the health insurance industry . . . I've gotten used to this ritual where the companies give Democrats this leeway, and say, 'Well, Obama's gotta say that stuff, but he'll come around. There's no way he'll touch Nafta or touch the WTO.'"

I see nothing to rejoice about here - Obama did exactly what Nader said he would do - talk tough on NAFTA to us and wink at the corporations. Hillary did the same thing.

By teh way, according to the corportions, NAFTA's been slightly beneficial to us ... likely they are cooking the books. In the meantime, it's been a disaster for Mexicans, who are known to cross the border looking for work since we flooded their markets with our surplus foodstuffs.

A pox ...  


I knew exactly what he was doing (0.00 / 0)
during the primary regarding NAFTA.  I would like to think that most of the people posting here knew it too.  I never believed a word either one of them said in that regard.  

But I'm glad he was honest about what's happened.  He strikes me now as being pretty thoughtful and self-reflective, which are qualities I really appreciate in a person, much less in a president.  The fact that Obama doesn't seem to buy into the hype surrounding him is something that makes me feel much better about voting for him in November.        


[ Parent ]
He's doing the standard Democrat tap dance around corporations ... (0.00 / 0)
Nothing new going on here. Business as usual. The primaries are over now, he's "moving to the center", that is, starting to be a little more honest about his positions.

On the other hand, McCain has gone deep right. What does that say about us?


[ Parent ]
I'm betting it means (0.00 / 0)
McCain will be the oldest man ever yet inaugurated as president of the United States of America...  

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox