Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


He's ba-a-a-a-ck!

by: Jay Stevens

Sat May 30, 2009 at 20:32:02 PM MDT


I saw this news thanks to problembear:

With the help of some local Republicans, a national group is trying to rally Montanans - and others - against health care reforms backed by President Barack Obama and Democrats in Congress.

Patients United Now, a group recently formed by a national foundation that champions conservative causes, is staging public rallies in Montana and running TV ads warning against "government-controlled health care" or a "Washington takeover" of health care.

The group's chief organizer in Montana is Jake Eaton, a former executive director of the Montana Republican Party.

Jake Eaton? Jake Eaton? You've got to be sh*tting me! I mean, this guy was drummed out of town for his leading role in the Montana GOP's voter suppression efforts last fall. He "chose" to go to Madison, WI, to "pursue other interests." Who knew, besides denying Montanans the right to vote, Eaton was interested in denying them health care, too!

Seriously, isn't Eaton guilty of violating several Montana statutes? Can we arrest him now he's back in the state? And isn't hiring him to run this effort a tacit acknowledgment that this is dirty politics?

Apparently Eaton's pals in "Patients United" - the group that hired this jack*ss to derail health care reform - are Tim Fox and Steve Daines. I mean, first string this is not. Dennison's description of the group:

Patients United Now was formed by the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a Washington, D.C., group that campaigns against liberal and left-leaning causes and promotes conservative causes.

For example, the foundation has downplayed global warming, opposes the president's efforts to address global warming, and opposed the president's economic stimulus package.

Patients United is against not only single-payer health care, it's against a public option for insurance. Odd, given that all the energy in Montana recently aimed at Baucus et al has been in favor of a robust government response to the health care crisis...

Jay Stevens :: He's ba-a-a-a-ck!
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
He's ba-a-a-a-ck! | 13 comments
I've been waiting for this ... (0.00 / 0)
Frankly, I hope it succeeds. Now is not the time for health care reform, given the path Baucus wants to take us down.

Canada did not get their system with a massive overhaul - it happened in Saskatchewan, and success bred more success. There's a strong push for single payer in California - once Arnold is out of the way, it might happen. Then the dominoes might fall.

Max is trying to take all of the good energy for reform and twist it into an insurance industry bonanza. Politics will indeed make strange bedfellows.  


True colors (4.00 / 1)
Frankly, I hope it succeeds.

Mark, you should be ashamed of this position of all or nothing, cut off everyone's nose to spite Max Baucus.

It's time to get over whatever slight Baucus did to you 20 years ago and get out of the way if you're not going to do anything but wail at everyone about how naive they are for trying to get something imperfect but good passed.

At least you've admitted that in your twisted world ancient grudges and ideological purity trump some form of healthcare for 48 million uninsured people.



[ Parent ]
Some form? (0.00 / 0)
What's that mean?

Like a band-aide?

Mark is standing between 40 million people receiving a band aide?

Oh no!!!!!


[ Parent ]
I'm very serious ... (0.00 / 0)
Max may be a dick, but so is Dr. Gregory House, and I like him alot. I can handle dickishness. I'm not standing between the perfect and the imperfect. I am not holding a grudge. I'm working, with other thousands, to stop something very bad from happening to us. If Max succeeds, it will not be undone in my lifetime or yours.

We have the most expensive health care system in the world that leave 47 million without insurance. Max wants to add a layer of subsidy to that. That's a bad thing.

Max won't say what his "public option" is, meaning that he probably intends for it to be a dumping ground for people private insurers haven't cherry-picked.

Max is working with the health insurance industry, who give him lots of money, and intends to screw us over. That's what I'm fighting. Join me.  


[ Parent ]
So we're in Bizarro World now? (0.00 / 0)
How is Baucus going to convince Obama not to veto the bill if it's going to be as shitty as your prognostications?

[ Parent ]
You're so cute! (0.00 / 0)
Don't know whack about Democrats, but you are cute.

[ Parent ]
Stay on message? (0.00 / 0)
How about this message...it is OBVIOUS that Republicans are going to do everything they can to kill health care reform...for two...maybe three reasons..

1st reason...they want to protect the corporatization of health care because it generates HUGE revenue for their financial backers...

2nd reason...if meaningful health care reform, that includes all citizens, is passed on the Democrats watch, the Republicans will not win another election for 30 years...

3rd....they are, in general, very mean spirited and hate America...


Keep your eye on the ball ... follow the money ... blah blah blah (0.00 / 0)
You're watching the wrong party. You're being triangulated. You need to keep your eye on the Democrats. They are the ones who will screw, blue and tattoo you. They are the ones who are looking out for the health insurance industry.


[ Parent ]
Some of us old guys learned to do more than one thing at a time. (0.00 / 0)
So I say:
keep an eye on both major parties and work for a social welfare party which will work toward a minimal lifestyle--for all people--everywhere...

[ Parent ]
For the time being ... (0.00 / 0)
it means watching the Democrats - they are in power ann are not a social welfare party. It's the old Clinton game - triangulation.  

[ Parent ]
He's ba-a-a-a-ck! | 13 comments
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox